Search academic texts

Information × Registration Number 0216U008007, 0115U006047 , R & D reports Title Environmental impact assessment drugs Clematis (Kloveyt IC) Nukop 25 Let Biot, SH, the Tribunal, WG 36 Roseyt LCD on non-target objects popup.stage_title Head Tkach Yevgenіya Dmitrіvna, Кандидат біологічних наук Registration Date 12-04-2016 Organization Institute of Agroecology and Environmental Management of NAAS popup.description2 In assessing the toxicity Tribunal, WG on earthworms found that mortality 51.2% recorded worms at a concentration of 1000 mg / kg dry soil. Thus, medial concentration of the drug is for LC50 979.9 mg / kg of dry soil in a concentration of 0.1 - 10.0 mg / kg of the drug is not toxic to tvaryn.Vstanovleno that the use of the drug Roseyt 36, Yellow to fight of weed control compared with no evident toxic effect on soil microflora, namely the number of microorganisms major ecological and trophic and taxonomic groups including agronomically useful microorganisms. Indicators of the intensity of carbon dioxide emissions when using the drug Roseyt 36 LCD indicates the level of overall biological activity of the soil and the processes that occur in it. Assessing toxicity Roseyt 36 LCD on earthworms found that the medial concentration LC50 for the drug is 468 mg / kg of dry soil in a concentration of 0.1 - 10.0 mg / kg it is not toxic to animals. Thus, when using the drug 25 Let Nukop Bio, VG for processing plants during the growing season to prevent disease found that the use of the drug compared with controls not shown toxic effects on soil microflora. Also, research the drug causes a slight decrease in the number Micromycetes, indicating the specificity of the drug. Indicators of the intensity of carbon dioxide emissions when using the drug 25 Let Nukop Bio, VG indicates the level of overall biological activity of the soil and the processes that result in it protikayut.V laboratory studies the impact of drug Roseyt 36 objects on the LCD aquatic ecosystem found that napivletalna toxicity (EK50) for the test object - Chlorella vulgaris was 0.102 ml / l, (LC50 96 h) for the test object - Guppy - 20.6 ml / l for Daphnia - 20.02 ml / g . Predicted maximum rate of acute toxicity Roseyt 36 LCD is algae is 0,005, for Daphnia and fish - 0.5 at the maximum rate costs 2.0 - 6.0 l / ha. According hazard classification of pesticides on non-target ecosystems objects of study drug, used to control weeds is pomirnotoksychnym for Daphnia and fish and toxic to algae. Found that when using the drug Roseyt 36, Yellow for controlling weeds compared to the control not shown toxic effects on soil microflora, namely the number of microorganisms major ecological and trophic and taxonomic groups including agronomically useful microorganisms. Assessing toxicity Roseyt 36 LCD on earthworms found that the medial concentration LC50 for the drug is 468 mg / kg of dry soil in a concentration of 0.1 - 10.0 mg / kg it is not toxic to animals. As a result of laboratory tests influence the Tribunal, WG on terrestrial ecosystems objects found that napivletalna toxicity (LD50) test for object - birds (Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica) after oral single dose is 2118,18 ± 150 mg / kg body weight, bee - 8,72 ± 0,8 g / osobynu.V laboratory results influence drug Tribunal, WG objects on the aquatic ecosystem found that napivletalna toxicity (EK50) for the test object - Chlorella vulgaris was 43 ml / l, (LC50 96 h) for the test object - Guppy - 417.6 ml / l for Daphnia - 357.1 ml / h. Predicted maximum rate of acute toxicity Tribunal WP is algae is 0,005, for Daphnia and fish - 0.5 at the maximum rate costs 15 - 50 g / ha. Found that when using the drug tribunal, WG for spraying crops established, and the number of bacteria is the main eco-trophic and taxonomic groups including agronomically useful microorganisms. Assessing toxicity Tribunal, WG on earthworms found that the concentration of LC50 for medial drug is 979.9 mg / kg of dry soil in a concentration of 0.1 - 10.0 mg / kg it is not toxic to animals. Product Description popup.authors Жура Ю.В, Крижанівський Б.А О.В. Шерстобоєва Стародуб В.І Ткач Є.Д popup.nrat_date 2020-04-02 Close