1 documents found
Information × Registration Number 2116U000650, Article popup.category Стаття Title popup.author popup.publication 01-01-2016 popup.source_user Сумський державний університет popup.source https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/83008 popup.publisher Сумський державний університет Description Дану роботу присвячено осмисленню проблеми значення архітектонічного коду семіотики простору російського науковця Л. Чєртова. Дослідження здійснюється шляхом компаративного аналізу з семіотикою архітектури У. Еко. Головну увагу приділено особливостям знакових засобів семіотики простору, природі амбівалентного взаємозв’язку означаючого та означуваного, важливості субстанціональної складової знакових носіїв та характеру їх рецепції. One of the main aspects the semiotics of Russian scientist L. Tchertov was analyzed in the given article. The author’s aim is to shows basic facets of problem of meaning of architectonical code of the semiotics of space. The study begins through comparative analyses with the semiotics of architecture of U. Eco. The special attention is paid to denotation meaning and connotation meaning (U. Eco) architectonical, object-functional and social-symbolical codes (L. Tchertov). The author determines, on the one hand common features between denotation meaning and object-functional code, and on the other hand between connotation meaning and socialsymbolical code. The special status has architectonical code. It is based on its synthetic nature that one allows to use few analytic codes as its structural material. The relationships in the framework of elements/signifiers are very important for constitution of meaning also. Problem of meaning is likewise closely connected with following factors: a) the ambiguous character of signs of architectonical code that is caused problems in defines species of them; b) the complex relationship links signifier and signified that include motivated and conventional aspects which combine in the nature of this relationship; c) important function material (substance) component of signs-vehicle which influences on process constitution of meaning; d) the reception signs of this kind has got complex rational and sensitive character; e) such approach allows to see the signs of architectonical code like images and symbols of the art. popup.nrat_date 2025-03-24 Close
Article
Стаття
:
published. 2016-01-01;
Сумський державний університет, 2116U000650
1 documents found
search.subscribing
search.subscribe_text
Updated: 2026-03-24
