Search academic texts

Information × Registration Number 0218U005178, 0115U000107 , R & D reports Title Southern Ukraine of the Middle Ages and Modern Age in the coverage of Greek and Turkic sources popup.stage_title Head Halenko Alexander Ivanovich, Registration Date 08-06-2018 Organization Main editorial of scientific series "Rehabilitate by history" popup.description2 The lack of sources for the history of Southern Ukraine hinders the rethinking of Ukraine's history, the relevance of which was determined by the armed aggression of Russia. Throughout history, Ukraine was a border guard. Originally, there was the border of the Mediterranean and the Eurasian Steppe, and then and Russia. However, Ukraine is considered to be the heir only of Russia, and it is extremely stolen from its history, leaving its entire south afloat until its inclusion in the Russian Empire. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian South began to be mentioned in written sources for half a millennium to Russia, and its capture is an event of global significance. Due to the Ukrainian Cossacks and the colonization of the Eurasian steppe steppe, they turned into the European and world barns, and then to the industrial center of world importance. At the same time, Ukrainians competed for survival both with the nature of the steppe, and with the incomparably greater military power of steppe communities, the latter of which were the Ottoman Empire and the Crimean Khanate. The fact that the Ukrainian nation, and ultimately the Ukrainian state, took place on the territory of three civilizations, while they deployed the eastern border of Europe, pushing the Islamic Middle East and steppe Eurasia to the fullest, can be regarded as outstanding achievements. Another thing is that the legacy of the missing civilizations of the South of Ukraine remains invaluable by Ukrainians themselves, not to mention all the others. Therefore, it is not surprising that Ukrainians found it difficult to find arguments in history, defending the European choice in the face of the ideological and military aggression of Russia. But to defend their choice Ukrainians will have to deal with themselves, identifying that their cultural heritage contradicts European values, and this pro-Russian and anti-European separatist rebellion just resembles the South (historically Donbass also belongs to the South Pole) . That is why the history of Ukraine is a large and complex mission of knowledge of all civilizations involved in it, and therefore, first and foremost, of those unknown who prevailed in the South. The translation of reports about Ukraine from the Ottoman chronicle of Mustafa Naimi (1655-1716) "Guseinovye gorod in the extraction of stories from the west and east", a direct translation from the Ottoman-Turkish language and the studio) relates to the glorious and turbulent time of Ukrainian history - the first half of the XVII century. It was at this time, long before the Moscow expansion, the success of the Ukrainian colonization and the end of the undivided hegemony of the Ottomans in the Black Sea. "Edition Archieve Archpriest Trifily Karazoglu: Primary sources on the history of the Greeks and Nadazov in the eighteenth century." (Kyiv: The Institute of Manuscripts of the NBUU, 2016, 318 pp.) Introduces 52 items of storage to the scientific circulation. They consist of narrative sources, as well as statement sources and correspondence. These sources are written in Greek, Urum (written in Caramelian script) and in Russian (with Ukrainian elements) languages. The study 2 monographs, 71 scientific articles totaling 97 quire. Product Description popup.authors Галенко Олександр Іванович Пелешко Адріана Володимирівна Чернухін Євеній Костянтинович popup.nrat_date 2020-04-02 Close