Пошук академічних текстів

Інформація × Реєстраційний номер 2118U005806, Матеріали видань та локальних репозитаріїв Категорія Стаття Назва роботи Decorative-formative and spatial organization of representative architecture 1930s − early 1950s as a reflection of the state-ideological goal Автор Bachinska LiudmilaBachinska Liudmila Дата публікації 19-07-2018 Постачальник інформації Київський національний університет будівництва і архітектури Першоджерело https://repositary.knuba.edu.ua/handle/987654321/2353 Видання Lira-K Опис During the first half of the social history ХХ century of European countries and the Soviet Union as a reaction to world events: the First World War, the revolutionary outbreaks in many European countries, the political, economic and cultural crisis, the disappointment of various segments of the population in the existing political regimes − in the European countries were born national-socialist parties that in some states formed totalitarian political regimes on the basis of a single party headed by a leader. From the side of state power, the replacement of the system of government led to the need for the formation of the urban environment as a carrier of a new state ideology, from the side of society there was a birth of a new social consciousness, which inevitably reflected in new directions of development of culture and architecture During the 1930s, the Soviet Union, both theoretically and practically, consolidated itself in positions of totalitarianism of the authorities with corresponding changes in architecture. Due to the common features in the system of governance, European states and the USSR certainly had common directions in architecture − axial symmetry, which as an architectural means always proclaims the order in the state, the large scale of buildings − a sign of strength and invincibility, composition based on the subordination of parts as a whole, reflecting the need for praise of power. But the differences in social stratification, which is natural in European countries, created on the basis of taking into account the property status of the owner, and artificial, adopted in the USSR, on the basis of the rise of the social role of the worker as a social hegemonic, led to the embodiment to the architecture a different state-ideological goal: in European countries − the ideal of strength, power, order, national superiority over other peoples; in the Soviet Union − equality, reliability of the protection of the state, a bright future in the life of the people. Додано в НРАТ 2026-04-20 Закрити