Пошук академічних текстів

Інформація × Реєстраційний номер 2125U003823, Матеріали видань та локальних репозитаріїв Категорія Стаття Назва роботи Meta-analysis of postwar recovery financing in Ukraine: Key public documents overview Автор Aleksin G.Romanyshyn V.Dyba O.Katunina O.Stashchuk D. Дата публікації 10-11-2025 Постачальник інформації Харківський національний економічний університет імені Семена Кузнеця Першоджерело https://repository.hneu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/37584 Видання ХНЕУ ім. С. Кузнеця Опис The aim of this paper was to conduct a meta-analysis of institutional assessments (2022-early 2025) to identify sectoral needs, funding gaps, and institutional obstacles that influence recovery timelines. A structured review and meta-analysis of more than 20 reports and sector studies were applied, along with comparative scenario design (Baseline, Accelerated, Delayed) and the creation of a diagnostic screening tool for the investment environment. Research found that total needs exceed USD 524 billion, mainly in energy, housing, transport, industrial assets, and agriculture; rising estimates reflect both additional damage and the adoption of EU technical, decarbonisation, and digital standards. It was noted that grants and concessional loans are necessary but not enough: key constraints include bankable project preparation, procurement quality, concession structure (risk sharing, step-in, foreign exchange risk), and donor coordination. Three scenario options were developed based on data: a Baseline path (15+ years) with limited private involvement; an Accelerated path (8-10 years) relying on standardised preparation, scalable guarantees, political-risk insurance, local-currency funding, and a strong coordination platform; and a Delayed path with longer timelines and growing regional disparities. An operational framework is proposed, comprising a network of Reconstruction Project Preparation Facilities, model concessional agreements aligned with EU standards, a blended-finance approach (including guarantees, local-currency facilities, and social bonds labeled), and a national reconstruction dashboard that links budgeting, procurement, and monitoring. It is shown that transparency does not equal absorption: digital procurement platforms increase contestability but do not ensure executable capital expenditure without engineering support, standardised documentation, and independent goal verification. The findings offer practical guidance for governments and municipalities to prioritise sectors, standardise project preparation, and deploy blended-finance tools that shorten recovery time and boost investment multipliers. Додано в НРАТ 2025-11-24 Закрити